"Progressive" divorce laws force husbands to becoming Outlaws.

"When severe injustice becomes law,defying it becomes a duty"

It appears that government is not satisfied with the undue concessions made to women in its 8 years of corruption and scandal ridden poor governance. From the DV act of 2005 which considered Domestic violence as an crime only when committed against a woman and exempted women from getting punished for committing the same offence against men to the current day the government has one after another churned more and more senseless pieces of legislation which defy any logic and corners innocent husband and takes away their right a peaceful existence. Not withstanding the soaring misuse rate 498a and DV act quoted as high as 98% of cases being false, the government is on track to introduce the most dangerous anti male legislation of in its 8 year tenure.

The Last Nail in the Coffin? 

The latest and perhaps the most dangerous of all legislations kept for the end is the innocently titled "Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Act", which promises to dissolve a marriage which has irretrievably broken. However instead doing justice to both divorcing parties the government has incentivized divorce to such an extent for women that they will stand to gain far more in a divorce than by staying in a marriage. The cost of the complete financial windfall that a woman stands to receive will be burdened on the husband who will be reduced to a bankrupt wreck losing half of everything that he earned , acquired or inherited from his ancestors before and during the marriage. Shockingly the wife will not be required to part with any of her earnings , ancestral or otherwise whatsoever. Only the husband will be fully and completely bled to finance the entire divorce and the entire financial settlement.

Only in India women can marry today and take half of EVERYTHING tomorrow !! 
1. Only a wife will the right to oppose a divorce petition . Should a wife choose to file for divorce the husband will have no right to even oppose the petition and save his marriage. Husbands who are poor , weak , ill and have simply fallen out of love will have no legal provision to save their marriages or demand a financial settlement from a financially stronger wife.

2. In the financial settlement , the wives will retain all her wealth , income , jewellery and ancestral property that she has inherited. However the government will annex 50% of the husband's movable and immovable assets acquired both BEFORE and DURING the marriage.Not only that , he will also have to part with 50% of his ancestral property or pay extra money to the wife in lieu of the same. While the wife would move on after receiving this financial windfall , the husband would also have to continue to fight 3 to 4 false criminal cases for years like 498a , DV and in the process lose whatever he has left after the property partition. Can it get more worse and biased than this?

Share only the credit not the debt
To elucidate with an example ,if a graduate man gets divorced at age 32 , then whatever movable and immovable property he has acquired since he started to work in his early 20's will be split evenly even though his wife had no contributions in acquiring those assets in any way.This would include his immovable property like real estate and movable property like bank savings accounts,  fixed deposits, shares , mutual funds acquired household articles like TV , fridge , Motorcycle , Car and furniture. If the husband has bought a property with a loan then the wife would not be burdened with the debt of the husband. The wife's share would limited only to the credit and assets of the husband and not his debt. The Govt and legal system would also annex the ancestral parcel of property that the man is likely to receive from his father , mother or grandparents. 

The wife however would retain EVERYTHING that she has saved or acquired before and during the marriage. She would also retain all her ancestral property that she would inherit from her paternal or maternal family.

Reducing Indian husbands second class citizens 
Indian husbands , especially Hindu husbands it appears have been stripped of their basis right of being property owners in a democratic country thereby reducing them to second class citizens. The state and law now want to annex the property of Hindu men on completely frivolous grounds. Indians have always been very extremely possessive and protective of their property and the Mahabharata war could have been averted if the Kauravas given a property of just 5 villages to the Pandavas. Even today most murders and violent incidents are in some way related to property disputes. In the event that a Hindu man stands to lose half of everything that he has every earned both before and after marriage along with share of his ancestral property to an undeserving and vengeful woman who hates him and in a marriage that has lasted just a few months, one cannot but shudder to contemplate the violent outcomes that such  scenarios would have on the man , his wife and his family members.

Complete loss of faith in Indian court systems
An outlaw is created when injustice becomes law.Why would one even go to the court, or for that matter listen to the courts if the role of the court would be to simply annex all that a man has earned or stands to inherit .The Indian Judiciary system  is today  nothing more than a façade of justice for a Indian husband thanks to the non-existence of a single law that can protect a man from an abusive and violent marriage.This fledgling judiciary and court system in the future would lose complete relevance and few if any husbands would approach or honour the courts which essentially would be reduced to a property transfer bureau where the hard earned movable and immovable property of a husband would be brutally annexed from him , partitioned and given to an undeserving wife, who by the way would get to keep all her own earnings and property intact.

The outcome of such nonsense laws would only lead to more violence , murders and social unrest. Divorce rates will reach 70% and marriage rates would plummet to single digits. People would prefer a few days in prison than giving away everything they have ever owned The Govt and feminists already responsible for the deaths and suicides of thousands of innocent husbands, will be additionally responsible for the ensuing explosion of violence and deaths that would follow with the enactment of such senseless laws.

How few radical womens groups hijack the democratic law making process

Women in India have enjoyed the protection of their male counterparts from times immemorial. Men in India are expected to give their lives to protect their sisters, daughters , wives and also unknown women . Hardly any woman has died fighting for the country. Only in this one area men have been allowed the  exclusive privilege for dying in the name of protecting women , society and motherland even as women have lobbied for reservations in more secure and comfortable positions in government and the private sector.   Not only are women in India protected by men they have been provided unconstitutional immunity of prosecution from many heinous crimes. Crimes of Domestic Violence, Spousal abuse, Sexual harassment and Rape. Even though the data shows that over 65000 husbands are driven to suicide due to spousal abuse annually the government has so far not created a single gender law to safeguard the rights of men in gender crimes. As a result of this not only do women commit these offences with complete disdain they in turn accuse the male partner of that offence immediately thereafter. Consequently we see widespread misuse of IPC 498a , Rape and the DV act and not a single women  has even been punished for misusing these laws against her husband/boyfriend. Rape of Males and boys is a still a taboo subject owing the protector and provider roles that males are expected to don for women. Archaic laws, feminist media and pressure from women’s rights groups do not even allow a woman to be accused of Rape. As a consequence very news of Indian female sex offenders or female abusers ever comes out in the public domain.

Democratic Law making process in the Sexual Assault billLately the Government after looking at the changing dynamics of sexual orientation of the Indian citizenry decided to make the Rape a Gender neutral offence so that men also could be accorded protection from female sex offenders. The Legal luminaries of the Law commission of India after a lot deliberation and studying the changing sexual dynamics and sexual orientation of the Indians in its one Hundred and Seventy Second Report on Review of Rape Laws make a very progressive recommendation that the Rape be made a gender neutral offence.  The same legislation was then passed on a eminent parliamentary committee chaired by a the Honorable Shri Venkaiah Naidu from the BJP. The Committee considered the Bill in eight sittings held on 4th, 21st, 28th January, 4th, 11th, 18th , 21st and 26th February, 2013. The Chairman in the Committee's sitting held on 4th January, 2013 apprised the Committee about the reference of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and the Committee decided to issue a Press Release soliciting views of the individuals/organizations, women organizations on various provisions of the Bill. The Committee also decided to obtain the views of the State Governments/UT Administrations on the Bill. In response to the Press Release (Annexure-II) issued, the Committee received 492 memoranda out of which 402 memoranda signed by individuals were found to be identical. The extensive and exhaustive review of the committee can only be understood when one goes through their report entire report. After such an exhaustive exercise the committee recommended that men and boys are equally prevalent to rape and sexual assault and hence the crime is a gender neutral crime.

Derailing the democratic law making process by a handful women’s groups and female hooligans

Over the years India has witnessed the increasing opposition from a very small minority of women’s rights organizations against granting protection to men from crimes committed by women in gender relationships. Neither are this elected representative and neither do they have the people’s mandate to make laws. They however resort to female hooliganism on streets when needed. Crimes like Domestic violence, Intimate terror and Rape are offenses which have been proved to have been committed by women on innumerable occasions and are recognized offences in the west. However in India these women’s organizations wage a ferocious war to deny men any protection from these heinous offences. The suggestions provided by the handful of aggressive women’s groups in all laws clearly include statutory language by addressing the accused as a universal, “HIM” and the complainant as a universal, “SHE”. This is nothing less than a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY. In the sexual assault case these handful of nondescript and unimportant women’s groups are now waging a war not to accord equal rights to men.[1] The government instead of strongly condemning such short sighted and narrow minded approach to law making and the blacklisting of such organizations in most cases chooses to fold and reverse the entire law making process under pressure from such groups. In this case the under pressure from these women’s groups the lameduck UPA2  chose to change the whole definition of rape from a gender neutral offence to an older regressive gender biased offence making the man has the universal accused at the very last moment against the recommendations of the Law Commission and the Venkaiah Naidu committee.[2]

Please stop the law making Tamsaha !!

If ultimately the feminists are to prevail what is the need for democratic  institutions like the law commission of India and the need to create committees to study the opinion of the citizenry. The govt can as well make the head the feminist groups the law maker of the nation and stop all this eye wash of democratic law making that it plays every time. The present situation leads to extreme suspicion that these groups have incriminating material with them by which they blackmail the entire government into submission thereby derailing the entire democratic law making process.

The prevalence of Female Sex Offenders

Rarely a day do goes by when we do not hear of a female teacher bring arrested for criminally chargeable sexual conduct with her teenage male students. Rapes of drunk or unconscious males by individual women or gang of women is also very commonly reported in the west. Female sex offenders are increasing at a very rapid rate in the west and some studies count them as high as close to 50% of the total volume of sex offenders.

The United States Department of Justice which found a rate of 8.3% for “Other sexual offenses” for females and The Australia Bureau of Statistics found a rate of 7.9% for “Sexual assault and related offences” for females.

In a study of 17,337 survivors of childhood sexual abuse, 23% had a female-only perpetrator and 22% had both male and female perpetrators.[3].

The National center for child abuse and neglect in the US states that the sexual abuse of children by women, primarily constituted 25% (approximately 36 000 children) of the sexually abused victims. This statistic is thought to be underestimated due to the tendency of non-disclosure by victims.[4]

According to a major 2004 study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education - In studies that ask students about offenders, sex differences are less than in adult reports. The 2000 AAUW data indicate that 42.4 percent of all students report a female offender .

Some have even suggested as many as 63% of sex abusers may be female. (Source: Schwartz, B. K., & Cellini, S. R. (1995). Female sex offenders. [5]

According to a 2011 US Center for Disease Control report there are an estimated 4,403,010 female victims of sexual violence that had a female only perpetrator. (Source: The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey) [6]

Sadly in India archaic laws, feminist media and pressure from women’s rights groups do not even allow a woman to be accused of Rape. As a consequence little very news of Indian female sex offenders comes out in the public domain.

Rape and Sexual Assault of Males is a recognized crime in the west already

Britain has already made Sexual Assault law Gender Neutral way back in 2003. The “Stern Review” published by the Government Equality Office in 2003 was a landmark study of Sexual Assault in the United Kingdom. It greatly widened the scope of sexual assault and also broke many perpetual myths around rape till date. The Stern review also dedicated a separate section for calling out the rising offence of rape against men. Below we quote some landmark observations of the Stern Review.

a.     “Women , Men and  Children and people of all ages and all social groups can be rape victims”

b.      “Around eight per cent of recorded rape cases are rape of a man. Men find it very difficult to talk about what has happened to them because of the common view that a man should be able to fight off an attacker.”

c.      “The Metropolitan Police Service has a leaflet on its website for male rape victims which set out the problems that men reporting rape can face. We welcome this initiative, which should give more men the confidence to report what has happened to them to the police.”

Male victims of sexual assault – information on a hidden crime	Is it different for a man?
Since 1994 the law has recognised the rape of men as a criminal offence. There is much myth around the sexual assault of men, which leads to many misunderstandings about the crime and the victims it affects. This has consequences in the way that men see themselves as victims of sexual crimes, and stops them from talking about what has happened to them and getting help.	Men experience similar feelings to women, such as shame, self blame and guilt. They may have extra issues to deal with, due to society’s belief that men should be able to protect themselves.

Rape is defined in the law of England and Wales. The law on rape was revised in 2003 after a long consultation process and the new Sexual Offences Act came into force on 1 May 2004. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (the Act) says that rape occurs when someone ‘intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with his penis’, that the other person does not consent to the penetration, and the perpetrator ‘does not reasonably believe that the other person consents’.

False Rape claims and the Outrageous Indian logic of “Sex with promise of marriage amounts to Rape”

Epidemic of false rapes is not an India centric problem. Owing to the epidemic of false cases reported in the UK the Stern report also dedicated a separate chapter to the issue of false allegations of Rapes. The British Court of Appeal said that false allegations damage conviction rates of genuine rapes and are ‘terrifying’ for innocent victims. The penalties for making false allegations and persisting with them through the legal process in the UK can be commensurately severe. A complainant making false allegations is normally given a substantial prison sentence.

One outrageous and one of the most frequently cited reason of Rape in India are incidents where consensual sexual intercourse between two willing partners suddenly becomes rape, much later due to a fall out in the relationship and breakdown in marriage. In the 21^st century where the gender orientations of young people are getting liberalized, this antiquated logic is still upheld by many courts and leads to a flurry of false rape cases when the jittered female partners file rape cases to get even with male partners. The Pune Police women’s cell in a 2010 survey of all rape cases in the city concluded that in 74 per cent of rapes since 2008 were actually consensual sex based on false promises of marriage.[7]

In the few weeks after the violent incidents in which a woman and her boyfriend were brutalized in a bus and the mob fury that followed, even the police were alarmed at the ferocious increase in the number  false rapes that were filed by women taking advantage of the sentiment of the nation. Below are just a few news excerpts from those few weeks of the Delhi aftermath  

• Times of India 4/1/2013: “90% of rape cases in Kishanganj false: SP” [8]
• Daily Pioneer 03/01/2013: “10 false rape cases in a week reported”[9]
• Indian Express 05/01/2013:” Moga police takes action against woman who registered false rape case” [10]
• Hindustan Times 31/01/2013: “Experts caution against rise in false cases”[11]
• Punjab News Line 02/1/2013: “Police cautioned against hasty action on false sexual harassment complaints”

With such overwhelming evidence it cannot be denied that the overwhelming majority of rape cases pending in courts are either false or consensual sex converted to rape. The problem with entertaining rape cases with such outrageous and frivolous grounds is that is puts an enormous pressure on the overloaded and poorly equipped investigating machinery and most importantly moves scarce resources away from the genuine cases, which needs attention. Such misuse of gender allegations has also been observed in 498a and DV act the misuse of which was referred to as “Legal Terrorism” by the Hon Supreme Court.

Influence of print and electronic media into sexual assault cases must be strictly regulated

The so called “self-regulating” Indian media has been repeatedly warned by the honorable courts not act as judge jury and executioner in subjudice and sensitive gender cases. The Media however has have ignored all requests from various government agencies and have destroyed the reputation of many  falsely accused in their relentless hounding of the accused and calling them demons, monsters , and other names in the open press and electronic media. The media also irresponsibly demands death sentences, castration and other ghastly medieval punishments knowing very well that there is no provision of these in the law. Irresponsible media coverage stokes people’s sentiments and leads to rioting, destruction of public property and death of innocent police personnel. Media picks and chooses its victims carefully according to their stature in the society and typically politicians, bureaucrats and rich individuals are their first targets. Reporting is done based on TRP’s and not on the merits of the case. Many times the Indian media works in collusion with women’s rights organizations to extract a hefty settlement from the accused to drop the charges and then terminate negative coverage. After the case is proved false the reporting of the case is subdued to a great extent but by then the damage to the falsely accused is irreparable and lifelong. With close to 70 to 90% of rape cases being false media regulation in sexual assault cases must be baked into the text of the law itself to preserve the sanctity of the falsely accused.

The past few years have witnessed on many occasions a very disturbing trend in India where knee jerk draconian solutions are forcefully demanded especially in gender issues at the behest of a handful of aggressive women’s rights groups, which normally cause unspeakable pain and suffering to the accused while leaving the main problem completely unsolved.  It is necessary to once again remind the government that while sexual assault is a crime like no other, a false accusation of sexual assault is also no less than imposing a death sentence on a person for life. Indians can only hope  that the Indian Govt comes to its senses and  makes changes which are gender neutral (applicable to both genders), balanced, unbiased, and most importantly do not prejudice any rights available under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. 

---

[1] http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms

[2] http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Only-men-can-be-booked-for-rape/Article1-1021702.aspx

[3] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15894146((Dube, Shanta R et al. “Long-Term Consequences of Childhood Sexual Abuse by Gender of Victim.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine. (2005):28(5), p 430 – 438)

[4] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740904000349

[5] In B. K. Schwartz & S. R. Cellini, (Eds.), The sex offender: Corrections, treatment, and legal practice (5-22). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute)

[6] http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf

[7] http://www.punemirror.in/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=2&contentid=201004282010042823514675722129e15&sectxslt=

[8] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-04/patna/36148093_1_bahadurganj-police-kishanganj-sp-complaint-cases

[9] http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/chandigarh/119813-10-false-rape-cases-in-a-week-reported.html

[10] http://www.indianexpress.com/news/moga-police-takes-action-against-woman-who-registered-false-rape-case/1054916

[11] http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Experts-caution-against-rise-in-false-cases/Article1-982905.aspx

Gillette India’s history of Anti-male advertising

It is really saddening that while companies making women’s products bend over backwards to work for women’s causes , companies like yours who make a living making men’s products vilify and show men in a negative light.

Gillette has a history of creating advertisements that incite marital and gender discord to sell its products. Around 2009 Gillette created a very controversial advertising campaign hiring some failed Bollywood actresses who gave out the message that a man having a beard in lazy and useless and urged female companions (girlfriends and wives) not to co-operate with men unless they shaved their faces. Would Gillette who also makes female shaving razors have the guts to create a campaign which said that  unless females who did not shaved their legs are ugly and that and asked men not to cooperate with women who did not shave their intimate areas of legs.  

The above example shows that Gillette instead of promoting the welfare of men conveniently misuses( shamefully so)   the inherent misandry(male hatred) prevalent in the society to its benefit.  Calling males names, accusing them of derogatory behaviours and urging female companions of inciting gender discord is all an accepted strategy at Gillette to sell products.

And after all the protests and the bad press that Gillette got in India after the shameful Anti-Male campaign in 2009 Gillette it appears has learnt nothing from it whatsoever. In these latest advertisements Gillette is promoting the message that men need to turn to solider to protect women and only then will they get their respects. While millions of sons of India have become martyrs already for the nation which is nothing but society and family , how many women have so far died protecting the country? Not even one !  While females demand reservations in comfortable posts in the government and private sector, have you heard of a single demand for women demanding reservations for defending the country’s borders in Siachen and Assam?

Gillete making more Keenan’s and Reuben’s( The unknown Protector)

Keenan Santos and Reuben Fernandez from Mumbai are two innocent men who in 2011 on the lines of the Gillette message gave their lives for protecting an unknown woman.[1] While the woman was unhurt these young men died protecting this woman. What was the outcome ? Was there a single fund created to protect men from violence ? Was there a single company , NGO or Government agency that intervened asking for new laws to protect men from violence?  In this age of equality women are responsible for the safety of men as much as men are for women’s. However Gillette’s is selling wares reinforcing of the behavior that Keenan and Reuben demonstrated and this will only lead to more men dying and Gillette wants to sell men’s products based on men being exposed to needless violence and deaths? Does Gillette know that Men and boys in India are already exposed to over 5 times more violence that women and girls and most of it is incited because of protection syndrome for women and family. Are the lives of men so cheap as cannon fodder that Gillette is promoting even more men becoming soldiers. Why is Gillette sending the message that death and violence for protecting women is a must in  order to gain manhood and thus gain acceptance from women. If Gillette has any conscience left must stop these advertisements immediately , publish an apology and  create  a memorial (on the lines of India Gate Delhi) paying homage to the millions of innocent men who have died protecting women. 

---

[1] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-11-05/mumbai/30363483_1_eve-teasing-case-keenan-and-reuben-death-penalty

Indian Feminists ko gussa kyu aata hai?

A week ago the feminists hailed the Justice Verma committee recommendations as landmark , predictably so since it essentially copied and pasted feminist recommendations like gender biased definition of sexual assault , presumption of guilt on a man , matrimonial rape in addition to the 15 other laws for matrimonial cruelty( another tool for misuse)amongst a host of other draconian anti-male recommendations . The feminists demanded that these recommendations needed to be implemented without any further ado as Indian men had no other work other than to rape women inside or outside of marriage. However 10 days later the same feminists are screaming intellectual self rape as their collective intellect and recommendation was criminally penetrated by the government’s move to create an ordinance which gender neutralized sexual assault and aligned with the recommendations from the people of India and gender neutral sexual assault laws the world over.

The wonder vehicle called “AMANAT“

Lets rewind a bit to December 16^th 2012. In a rarest of the rare case a girl and her boyfriend boarded a Delhi bus in which they were badly beaten and sexually abused. Both the boy and the girl were grievously wounded in this ghastly attack and were thrown from the bus on the roadside where not a single Delhiwallah offered them any help. While the man recovered from his injuries the woman sadly succumbed to injuries sustained. The initial reaction to this was muted until the media started to highlight the issue. The movement slowly gathered steam and culminated with a few hundred young boys and girls mostly from JNU fine arts departments started to resort to hooliganism and stone pelting in the national capital. What were these protesters exactly demanding from the government? They demanded three simple things: speedy justice , apt punishment and prevention of such future incidents. They did not demand marital rape , exclusion of female sexual predators or presumption of guilt for men. During these unfortunate incidents the TRP chasing Indian media which can classified as ordinary at best started their evening studio courts passing summary judgements  In the juries of so called “eminent personalities” you could see the same person appearing in a discussion from 7PM to 8PM in one channel and the same person then appearing on another channel between 11PM to 12PM.

The feminists finally had found the wonder vehicle called “AMANAT” that they were waiting for. They finally had the fire in which they could cook their Anti-male porridge. The feminists appearing on the TV channels now began to twist the message from the Delhi incident to so called marital rape which had no connection or correlation to the Delhi incident whatsoever and demanded that marital rape be added as an additional parameter along with a host of other sections essentially to deny men any chance of a fair trial in the criminal justice system. Particular to demand and support marital rape was a journalist whose claim to fame is not unbiased and investigative journalism but radical feminist’s views and standing beside a firing bofors gun eons ago.

Our Judge – Our Judgement and Law making in News studios

In India every major incident leads to forming of a commission and so did this. However this was headed by a long retired Judge accused of corruption charges himself and whose appointment itself was in collusion with the feminists. This honourable judge’s claim to fame during his days in Supreme Court was a judgement consisting of set of guidelines on sexual harassment against women. While passing these guidelines which I repeat once again was for women only, this judge demonstrated his poor collective legal knowledge and equally poor understanding of gender offences when he completely ignored the cardinal fact that sexual harassment is not a crime of passion but that of power. He also ignored that sexual harassment laws in over 35 countries in the world are gender neutral. Which such an overarching bias against men in general he seemed the ideal choice to head this stage managed committee and deliver results on the so called people’s will. The question was, what was the need to change the law in the first place? Indians or even the protesters never demanded a change in the law, only the few militant feminists did. The law of murder was automatically applicable in case the victim of rape died which attracted the death sentence. Still , a review and amendments in the law were forcefully demanded by the feminists to attempt use the AMANAT incident a vehicle to get a lot of draconian anti-male legislations through the door.

Moving ahead,  the committee set up a e-mail and a fax number to collect the collective will of the people. It is pertinent to note that the fax number rarely worked and that repeated attempts to send a fax by this NGO only resulted in message stating that the number is not in service. The fax rarely appeared to be busy.

After 29 days of deliberations the committee presented its findings and stated that they had received over 80,000 recommendations which they shockingly claimed to have completely gone through. If each recommendation had at least 2 pages and each page had at least 250 words then this committee possibly endowed with feminist superpowers went through over 80,000 x 2 x 250 = 40000000 words in 29 days which means an average of 1400000 words per day on average. Imagining the incredible pace at which this 75 year old judge and his team claimed to have worked to read these recommendations, if only this judge would have worked at the same pace in his days as a working judge in the various courts the judicial pendency of the nation would not have been 56 million cases as it stands today. But we will believe what this committee said at face value just like Indian courts believe women and move on to his legal recommendations which were even more astonishing.

The legal recommendations of this stage-managed committee headed by a feminist were equally mind-blowing and had no parallels. From the committee’s report it was clear that a handful of women’s groups were selectively invited for deposition in front of the committee. Most of these groups invited were widely known for their aggressive anti-male approach to gender laws and inclination to deny protection to men from crimes committed by women. The recommendations appeared to have been taken from holy bible of radical feminist ideology and meant that Indian men are essentially rapists by birth and are always on the look out for women to rape. Not only is the guilt of men presumed, but the innocence and truthfulness of women was also presumed. Women sexual predators did not exist and it is men who sexually abused everyone else. Above all marital rape had been added as a section ignoring 498a and DV act which were more than enough to cover any such incidents. The committee had also ignored the principles of natural justice and in rape cases supported presumption of guilt on the accused and presumption of truthfulness on the female complainant. The nation was surprised how a committee which claimed  so many  eminent panel members chose to ignore this fundamental pillar of justice even as the police reports collected nationwide stated that over 74% to 90% rapes in India were false. Not a single point in the entire legal recommendations section pointed to natural justice , gender neutrality and opportunity of giving the accused a fair trail .

After the report , the feminists opened champagnes as their hero had delivered . Millions of innocent Indian men and boys men were soon to be legally castrated by the draconian senseless piece of recommendations which was stage managed in a committee by the feminists , for the feminists and which catered only to the legal terrorists. Some media anchors especially the one I noted above hailed this as the most progressive legislations India has ever seen.

Feminists-Communist ka gussa( Irrelevance at its best )

The government in its wisdom has now chosen to show that communists and feminists do not matter in law making and that laws cannot be determined by  a few radical feminist organizations but by the will of the people at large. The government has accepted the recommendations of the committee wherever they seemed apt but has retained punishment for female sex offenders and chosen not to include marital rape rightly predicting its severe misuse like IPC 498a and DV act.

The changes by the government were accepted by the country with open arms. However a certain feminist organization and its seemingly irrelevant communist party mothership condemned the move by the government. The feminists activated their sleeper cells and they started to write meaningless articles spewing venom and criticizing the government for not listening to this judge and for not making senseless draconian legislation as per his recommendations. What the feminists need to understand is that they DO NOT represent or have the support of the people of India . In fact they do not even represent the women of India. The women of Indian have been long protected by men and continue to cherish the relationships with their brothers , fathers and husbands. Indian women have witnessed firsthand how laws like IPC 498A and DV act have snatched innocent sons from mothers and brothers from sisters and want the nonsense feminist ideology to end. India as it appears has become the Stalingrad for the few remaining rampaging feminists who are becoming irrelevant every day and will soon fade into the sunset !

INSAAF condemns unconstitutional legal recommendations of Justice Verma Committee

INSAAF is shocked at the legal recommendations that have emanated from the Justice Verma committee  We expected to see balanced judicially prudent and legal justifiable recommendations from a committee which we considered would propose simple steps, reduction in duplicate laws to reduce tendency  increased prosecution while protecting the innocent and punishment irrespective of gender.

Instead what we see is addition of another law for matrimonial cruelty, assumption of guilt for accused ,  suppression of previous behaviour for accuser , exemption of female sex offenders from criminal justice system and strong to protect female misusers of genders laws. The committee in its collective experience seems to believe that women in India cannot commit sex offences , lie and misuse gender laws even as the overwhelming ground evidence suggests the contrary. While committee harps on human rights , social rights for women in many places , the same have been completely subverted for men who cannot expect even close to a fair trail should any of the recommendations comes into existence. 

INSAAF  feels morally compelled to join the group of Men's Welfare organisations in the below joint press release condemning the recommendations of the committee and demands the scrapping of all legal amendments recommended. 

Press release from coalition of Men's welfare NGO condemning Justice Verma Commitee recommendations  

  

Tsunami of false rapes cases exposed in past few days

The voilent incident in Delhi with a boy and girl is leading to an exposure of a Tsunami of false rape cases from women all over India. The issue of false rapes in India was well document but was rarely discussed . It came to light time and again that over 74% rapes were false and consensual , however the Indian media had no interest in exposing these false cases. However the incidents in Delhi has led to a renewed interest into the magnitude of this serious problem . False rape are equally dangerous and heinous as the crime itself because i leads to a irreparable harm to the life of the accused. Apart from languishing in jail for moths the accused loses his social esteem , earning potential and manu a times is driven to commit suicide . However in most cases the woman filing the false is let go with a slap on the wrist or is slapped with Sec 182 whose punishment is no way even close to the pain and suffering she imparts to the accused . Below is a running list of the phenomenal number of false rape cases unearthed for the first time by the media. Note that the problem is not restricted to a certain area is rampant throughout the nation in various states. The issue is also chronic in tribal areas which are largely unaffected by western influence.  What punishment do you think should be imparted to women filing false cases and should the rape law have a strong misuse clause ? Please comment your thoughts .  (This article will be updated with more news of false rapes as they come out . Please post links of finds in the comments area. )

Staggering Magnitude of False rapes in India

Exposed : WCD's intentions to study Sexual Harassment on men is an eyewash

A couple of months back the Women and Child development Minister under attack for ignoring  overwhelming evidence of sexual Harassment on men and denying men protection under the proposed "Protection of women from sexual harassment" stated the below and was quoted by a TOI article on 21-Aug-2012 . 

"I want to get a study conducted to find out what kind of harassment of males is prevalent and to what extent at workplaces, though till now only the harassment suffered by the women has been spoken about," 

Her intentions sounded very suspect at the onset since the same ministry a few years ago had stated "Protecting men is not the mandate of the WCD" while ignoring representations from hundreds of Indian citizens praying to make the Sexual Harassment at Workplace bill gender neutral. 

To discover if the WCD ministry was really going to walk the talk or  if this was just another one of their smokescreens to buy time an RTI was sent to the WCD ministry to get the details of the proposed study that was to be conducted to learn about of the propensity and prevalence of sexual harassment of men at the workplace.The questions were related to the details of the proposed study , budget allocated , questions framed and time duration . Also it was asked , why the Protection of women from sexual harassment was being introduced in the Rajya Sabha when the study on men was not even started ? 

From the responses of the WCD ministry( see RTI questions and response below) it is clear once again that the WCD minister's comment of conducting a study on men was nothing more than an mere eyewash to delay the opposition against this law and get another biased feminist law passed in the Rajya Sabha by hook or crook. It is extremely shameful that minister of cabinet rank resorts to such blatant falsehood in public when cornered on an proposed draconian anti male feminist legislation with genuine facts and data.  
 
The RTI questions and the WCD Ministry's response are as under for public consumption. 

 WCD response to status of study of Sexual Harassment on Men